by Joy Maitland | Aug 12, 2025 | All Employees, Board Members, Board Trustees, CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, Emerging Leaders, General Managers, Heads of Divisions, Human Resources (HR)
Strategic Visibility: Turning Plans into Shared Roadmaps
(If your strategy only lives in the boardroom, you do not have a strategy — you have a secret)
Let me guess: somewhere in your organisation, there is a beautifully formatted strategy document sitting on a shared drive that only a handful of people have opened. And you think that is fine, because “not everyone needs to know everything.”
Here is the uncomfortable truth: when your plans are invisible to most of your people, you are not protecting them from overload. You are depriving them of alignment.
Gallup’s 2025 data makes the case in blunt numbers:
- Only 47% of employees strongly agree they know what is expected of them at work.
- Overall engagement is hovering at 32%.
(Gallup source)
And here is the kicker — when leaders communicate clearly, inspire confidence in the future, and share progress openly, 95% of employees fully trust them. (Gallup source)
Visibility is not just about ‘keeping people informed.’
It is about inviting them into the journey, not as passengers but as navigators. Because when people can see the route, they can adjust their own work to get you there faster.
Try these counter-intuitive visibility moves:
- Post the messy version – Share transformation drafts, not just the final polished roadmap. Let your teams see how strategy evolves and where they can shape it.
- Show the scoreboard – Create a living dashboard that updates in real time, visible to everyone, not just the C-suite.
- Name the risks – Publish the top three uncertainties you are facing. Watch how quickly people start solving them when they are not hidden.
- Shrink the updates – Instead of an annual “state of the nation” presentation, do a five-minute weekly progress video. Short, sharp, human.
Why most leaders resist this:
They fear that showing too much will cause distraction, dissent, or panic. The irony? The opposite is true. When people cannot see the plan, they make up their own — and those versions are rarely flattering or aligned with reality.
Your strategy should be like a shared map, not a locked safe. When every team member can see where you are heading, what has been achieved, and what is next, you get alignment without micromanagement, accountability without coercion, and trust without spin.
So, ask yourself: If I dropped into the break room today and asked any random person to explain our top three priorities, would I like the answer? If not, your roadmap might be beautiful — but it is still hidden.
The Right Conversation Can Change Everything. Let’s Talk.
by Atiya Sheikh | Aug 12, 2025 | All Employees, Board Members, CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, General Managers
Building Trust Through Transparent Systems
(Why leaders who “show their workings” win more than just respect)
Here is a question for you: if your organisation’s performance review process was leaked to the press tomorrow, would you be proud—or scrambling to rewrite it?
That is not a hypothetical to make you sweat. It is a reality check. Because the truth is, trust is not built on charisma or charm. Trust is built in the small print—those unglamorous systems that dictate how people are evaluated, rewarded, and promoted.
Transparency is not about telling people everything.
It is about ensuring the “how” is as visible as the “what.” McKinsey’s data is uncomfortably clear: organisations that put people—not paperwork—at the centre of performance management are 4.2 times more likely to outperform their peers, 30% more likely to grow revenue, and see 5% lower attrition. (McKinsey link)
Gallup piles on another uncomfortable truth: employees who receive daily feedback are 2.1 times more likely to trust leadership, and if they believe their leaders genuinely listen, that trust more than doubles. (Gallup link)
Here is the twist:
Transparency is not a “feel-good” exercise. It is a strategic weapon. When you make your systems visible—warts and all—you remove the shadows where suspicion thrives. And when suspicion dies, collaboration flourishes.
If you are serious about this, try these experiments:
- Show the algorithm – Publish the exact performance review criteria. Let your team see how the sausage is made.
- Reverse-engineer decisions – For your next big call, publish the rationale. Every assumption. Every discarded option.
- Test the blindfold – Imagine handing your salary banding guidelines to someone in another department who has never met the individuals in question. If the process is truly clear and objective—based solely on role requirements, market benchmarks, and documented criteria—they should be able to determine the exact same pay range you would. If they cannot, it means your system is open to personal bias and inconsistent application.
- Make “why” a habit – Not just “what we decided,” but “why we decided it.” Every time.
The easy excuse is, “But people will not understand the complexity.” I would argue: if your people cannot understand your systems, that is your system’s fault—not theirs.
Transparency does not make you predictable. It makes you dependable. And in a world where the average worker trusts their employer more than government, media, or NGOs (Edelman Trust Barometer), dependability is the currency of leadership longevity.
So, one final challenge: what would your team say if they saw the inner workings today? If the answer is “they would leave,” you already have your real problem.
The Right Conversation Can Change Everything. Let’s Talk.
by Joy Maitland | May 25, 2025 | Board Trustees, CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, General Managers, Heads of Divisions
Integration or Implosion? Winning the Culture Battle After a Merger
Mergers and acquisitions are often hailed as game-changing strategies to achieve rapid growth, scale innovation, and strengthen market position. But all too frequently, they fail to deliver the anticipated results. The missing link? Human experience.
At inemmo, our work with executive teams across multiple sectors has revealed a recurring truth: even the most financially sound and strategically aligned acquisitions can unravel when the employee integration journey is overlooked. The greatest risk in any merger is not just technological or operational misalignment—it is the disengagement of the very people expected to drive post-deal success.
The Human Cost of Poor Integration
Employees within acquired organisations often describe the experience as disorienting, isolating, and at times, deeply unsettling. These individuals—many of whom bring invaluable innovation, knowledge, and relationships—are too often left feeling voiceless, underutilised, and disconnected. One described the moment of acquisition news as “like a death in the family.” Such emotional fallout is not only widespread—it has lasting business consequences.
Where this disconnect persists, engagement plummets, productivity stalls, and attrition increases—sometimes for years. Alarmingly, even in cases where the acquisition brings together complementary capabilities, a poorly managed culture clash can erode the very value the deal aimed to create.
The Opportunity: Building a Unified, Respectful Culture
Creating a unified culture doesn’t mean enforcing uniformity. It means aligning behaviours, systems, and values in a way that respects the heritage of both organisations while moving forward with clarity. To achieve this, acquirers must place culture integration on equal footing with legal, financial, and operational priorities.
Based on insights from across the M&A landscape and inemmo’s leadership development expertise, five practices stand out:
1. Conduct a Dual-Sided Culture Assessment
Most firms assess the culture of the company they’re acquiring. Far fewer hold up the mirror to their own. This is a strategic misstep.
A meaningful culture assessment must explore both entities—mapping how they make decisions, manage risk, and engage with innovation. These insights enable leadership to anticipate friction points and clarify the path forward. Cultural differences, if left unexamined, can delay innovation, undermine collaboration, and stifle initiative.
2. Create a Clear, Human-Centred Culture Integration Plan
Integration must be more than a timeline—it should be a leadership commitment to clarity, dialogue, and empathy. Leaders must articulate not only what will change, but why. They should equip managers with the rationale, resources, and autonomy to bridge cultural gaps with authenticity.
This is especially true when legacy cultures hold prized traits—entrepreneurial energy, speed, creativity—that risk being stifled. As we’ve seen, when acquiring firms pause to explain their methods, rather than impose them, engagement and trust increase.
3. Map the Employee Journey—Before It Begins
A merger feels abstract until it becomes personal. Will their systems change? Who do they report to? How do they apply for leave?
Mapping the employee journey—across 12 to 24 months—allows organisations to prepare for real-life milestones and manage change compassionately. Whether it’s benefits queries, IT logins, or badge renewals, every interaction either builds or erodes trust.
Just as importantly, clarity must replace ambiguity. If certain decisions are still pending, say so. Transparency—even about uncertainty—is more reassuring than misleading certainty.
4. Empower Middle Managers as Culture Translators
Middle managers are the bridge between strategy and reality. Yet too often, they are brought in late, without the information or tools to lead their teams through change.
Equipping these leaders with decision rights, context, and regular access to senior integration teams transforms them into confident, credible guides. They need to be heard—early, often, and visibly—as they carry the message and pulse of the integration.
5. Stay Agile and Responsive to What Emerges
No matter how detailed the integration plan, new insights will emerge. Perhaps the culture is more risk-averse than anticipated. Perhaps legacy rituals, like Friday pizza gatherings, are core to team morale.
Success lies not in rigid execution, but in responsiveness. Build in review phases. Use pulse surveys. Act swiftly on what matters—however small it may seem. Integration is not a one-time event, but a dynamic process that requires real-time adjustment and human leadership.
Cultural Intelligence in Action
At inemmo, we believe cultural intelligence is a decisive advantage during M&As. Leaders who listen closely, communicate clearly, and integrate respectfully not only preserve value—they unlock it.
A successful merger is not just about combining balance sheets or operational systems. It’s about blending ambitions, aligning behaviours, and creating a shared story that people want to be part of.
The deal may be signed in the boardroom. But its true success is determined in the hearts and minds of employees—day by day, conversation by conversation.
by Atiya Sheikh | Mar 30, 2025 | CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, News & Articles
What makes teamwork effective—and why it fails? In the workplace, no matter the industry—from healthcare and education to finance and tech—success is rarely the result of individual brilliance alone. It’s teams that deliver the results.
But what separates high-performing teams from those that struggle? Why do some groups work like clockwork while others fall into confusion, miscommunication, and missed deadlines?
Welcome to the psychology of teamwork—a field that uncovers what really goes on beneath the surface of collaboration, and how you can build better teams that consistently deliver.
Why Teamwork Is More Complex Than It Looks
Teamwork may sound like a soft skill, but it’s a sophisticated blend of group dynamics, leadership, communication, and role clarity. Psychology first began exploring teamwork through the lens of group identity: how we define ourselves through the teams we’re part of, and how we behave differently when we’re in a group versus acting alone.
Over time, the field evolved. Researchers now examine how teams form, how they make decisions, what makes them efficient—and what makes them fall apart.
When Teamwork Fails: A Real-World Scenario
Let’s take an example from the retail banking world—though the same principles apply across industries.
A customer services advisor meets with a client applying for a mortgage. The standard process involves the advisor gathering initial details and booking a follow-up with a mortgage adviser, who then conducts affordability checks and submits the formal application.
In this case, the advisor assumes the adviser will confirm all financial documentation. Meanwhile, the adviser—new to the branch—believes those checks have already been handled. A key document is missed, the application is delayed, and the client becomes frustrated.
No one was careless. But a lack of shared understanding and clear communication led to an avoidable error.
The Three Pillars of Effective Teamwork: Collaboration, Coordination, Communication
At the heart of any effective team are three essentials:
- Collaboration
True collaboration isn’t just working side-by-side—it’s aligning on a shared goal and appreciating the value of different perspectives. For instance, in a project team, one member might spot a client risk others overlook due to their specific expertise. Strong collaboration means their voice is heard and considered.
- Coordination
Teams must be clear on roles, responsibilities, and timing. Who’s doing what—and when? Without proper coordination, even simple tasks can fall through the cracks, especially in industries with tightly sequenced workflows like healthcare, finance, or manufacturing.
- Communication
Poor communication is the most common cause of team breakdowns. It’s not just about talking more—it’s about ensuring that information is accurate, timely, and reaches the right people.
Why Every Team Needs a Leader—But Not Always the Same Kind
Leadership style can make or break a team. Broadly speaking, there are two main styles:
- Democratic leadership: values group input, ideal for building trust and motivation.
- Autocratic leadership: makes decisions quickly, useful in high-pressure or time-sensitive settings.
The best leaders adjust their approach based on the team’s needs and the task at hand. Interestingly, research shows that gaining power tends to shift people toward more independent thinking—often reducing their willingness to consult others. This is true for both men and women, though women leaders often maintain a stronger group orientation even as they rise.
What Goes Wrong in Group Decisions? Two Common Pitfalls
- Groupthink
This occurs when teams avoid conflict to maintain harmony. Members stop questioning decisions—even bad ones. It’s how warning signs get ignored and poor choices are rubber-stamped. Think of a team launching a flawed product because no one wants to speak up.
- Group Polarisation
Sometimes, groups make more extreme decisions than individuals would. A cautious team becomes overly conservative, or a confident team takes bigger risks than any one member would suggest alone. It’s a distortion of reality that comes from collective confidence—and it can backfire.
Size Matters: Why Smaller Teams Often Perform Better
The ideal team size? Around five people.
Once a team grows beyond that, accountability tends to blur. People assume someone else will take responsibility. This leads to social loafing, where effort drops because everyone believes others are picking up the slack.
In large organisations, this problem scales. When something goes wrong, individuals are quick to say, “That wasn’t my area.” The collective “we” dissolves, replaced by a flurry of self-preservation.
The Cultural Side of Teamwork
Teamwork isn’t just psychological—it’s cultural. In Western countries, the individual is often seen as the core unit. In Eastern cultures like Japan or South Korea, the group comes first.
This plays out in how accountability is assigned. In Europe or the US, a failed initiative may be traced to a single manager. In Japanese firms, the entire team may take collective responsibility.
Understanding these cultural differences is vital, especially for global teams.
How to Build a High-Performing Team
Strong teams don’t come together by chance—they’re built deliberately. Here’s how:
- Keep teams as small as possible for the task
- Define clear roles and responsibilities
- Select members for both technical ability and interpersonal skills
- Create psychological safety where people feel safe speaking up
- Encourage empathy and perspective-taking
In some industries, exercises that ask team members to “step into each other’s shoes” have shown real value. For example, asking a team leader to write from the perspective of a frontline employee can open up new insights into how decisions are experienced on the ground.
Diversity Isn’t Just a Buzzword—It’s a Necessity
Teams that are too similar in mindset, background, or personality often suffer from groupthink. In sectors like consulting or investment banking, hiring from the same profile pool can reduce the range of ideas and increase competition within teams.
The strongest teams are diverse in thought, experience, and working styles—and know how to leverage that difference rather than suppress it.
Final Thoughts: The Future of Work Is Team-Based
Whether you’re delivering financial services, leading a healthcare team, managing a creative agency, or running a non-profit, your results depend on how well your team works together.
The psychology of teamwork offers more than theory—it gives us a framework to build better collaboration, avoid common pitfalls, and unlock real performance.
What makes teamwork effective—and why it fails? Because in the end, success isn’t just about having great people.
It’s about building great teams.
The Right Conversation Can Change Everything. Let’s Talk.
See Harvards Business Review
