by Atiya Sheikh | Mar 30, 2025 | CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, News & Articles
What a 19th-century war game reveals about strategic thinking, adaptability, and decision-making for today’s senior business leaders.
In 1824, a young Prince Wilhelm of Prussia witnessed a military simulation that would go on to change the fortunes of his army—and perhaps the shape of Europe. Kriegsspiel, a war game designed with maps, wooden battalions, and probability tables, was more than a pastime. It became an engine of innovation. Under Wilhelm’s reign, this simulation helped shape military tactics that brought unexpected success in the Franco-Prussian War. Its continued evolution laid the groundwork for predictive logistics, strategic modelling, and ultimately the birth of modern game theory.
For today’s senior leaders, the lesson is clear: when complexity reigns, the ability to model reality—rather than simply react to it—becomes a defining advantage.
Simulating Complexity
The genius of Kriegsspiel was its ability to condense an overwhelming battlefield into a controlled, analytical environment. Its relevance today lies in its approach to complexity. Senior leaders navigating volatile markets, geopolitical shocks, and AI disruption face similarly intricate challenges. The temptation is to act decisively and instinctively—but modelling, simulation, and structured experimentation are far more effective tools.
The most forward-thinking organisations are already building internal “war rooms” that operate in much the same way. They use scenario planning not simply to forecast risk, but to rehearse resilience. Supply chain breakdowns, cyber threats, and consumer shifts are gamed out with cross-functional teams, enabling adaptive strategies long before crisis strikes.
The Leadership Mindset Shift
But the power of simulation lies not in the models alone—it lies in the mindset it cultivates. Prince Wilhelm didn’t simply mandate the use of Kriegsspiel for entertainment. He institutionalised it as a learning tool, embedding it into the professional development of every officer. In doing so, he transformed a military culture from rigid tradition to experimental agility.
Modern business leadership demands a similar shift. Organisations that treat uncertainty as a problem to eliminate will remain brittle. Those that treat it as a landscape to explore—one where tactics can be tested, recalibrated, and refined—will be better placed to navigate transformation with confidence.
This requires humility as much as ambition. Leaders must be willing to ask: What don’t we know? Where might we be wrong? Which assumptions should we challenge? These questions are uncomfortable, but they’re also the entry point to deeper strategic insight.
Models Are Not the Territory
Still, simulation has its limits. Just as Kriegsspiel compressed the battlefield into a tidy map, modern tools—from spreadsheets to digital twins—are simplifications of reality. Kelly Clancy, in her wide-ranging study of how games shape perception, warns that the map can begin to distort the territory. Overreliance on models can lead leaders to prioritise what is measurable over what is meaningful.
The same caution applies to the way game theory and behavioural economics have entered boardroom thinking. When human behaviour is treated as a matter of incentives alone—as though employees, customers or partners are pure rational actors—organisational strategy risks becoming divorced from lived experience.
The best leaders recognise the utility of these models without being seduced by their elegance. They combine data with judgement, logic with empathy. They understand that metrics are tools, not truths.
Designing for Adaptability
In today’s digital environment, game-like mechanisms are everywhere. Reputation systems, social scoring, and algorithmic feedback loops all shape how value is perceived and decisions are made. Businesses too often absorb these mechanisms passively—optimising for clicks, engagement, or customer “loyalty”—without stepping back to ask whether the game they are playing is the one they ought to win.
Leadership today must be more deliberate in shaping the rules of engagement. This means designing organisations not just for efficiency, but for adaptability. It means rewarding learning, not just output. And it means recognising that agility is not the same as chaos—just as improvisation in jazz is rooted in deep discipline.
What a 19th-century war game can teach us about 21st-century leadership
What can a 19th-century war game teach us about 21st-century leadership? More than we might expect. In an age where strategy must be as fluid as the challenges it seeks to overcome, simulation becomes more than a technique—it becomes a habit of mind.
To lead effectively today is to engage with complexity on its own terms. Not to flatten it, ignore it, or hope it goes away. But to step inside it, play it out, and emerge with clearer thinking and sharper intent.
The Right Conversation Can Change Everything. Let’s Talk.
by Atiya Sheikh | Mar 30, 2025 | CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, News & Articles
What makes teamwork effective—and why it fails? In the workplace, no matter the industry—from healthcare and education to finance and tech—success is rarely the result of individual brilliance alone. It’s teams that deliver the results.
But what separates high-performing teams from those that struggle? Why do some groups work like clockwork while others fall into confusion, miscommunication, and missed deadlines?
Welcome to the psychology of teamwork—a field that uncovers what really goes on beneath the surface of collaboration, and how you can build better teams that consistently deliver.
Why Teamwork Is More Complex Than It Looks
Teamwork may sound like a soft skill, but it’s a sophisticated blend of group dynamics, leadership, communication, and role clarity. Psychology first began exploring teamwork through the lens of group identity: how we define ourselves through the teams we’re part of, and how we behave differently when we’re in a group versus acting alone.
Over time, the field evolved. Researchers now examine how teams form, how they make decisions, what makes them efficient—and what makes them fall apart.
When Teamwork Fails: A Real-World Scenario
Let’s take an example from the retail banking world—though the same principles apply across industries.
A customer services advisor meets with a client applying for a mortgage. The standard process involves the advisor gathering initial details and booking a follow-up with a mortgage adviser, who then conducts affordability checks and submits the formal application.
In this case, the advisor assumes the adviser will confirm all financial documentation. Meanwhile, the adviser—new to the branch—believes those checks have already been handled. A key document is missed, the application is delayed, and the client becomes frustrated.
No one was careless. But a lack of shared understanding and clear communication led to an avoidable error.
The Three Pillars of Effective Teamwork: Collaboration, Coordination, Communication
At the heart of any effective team are three essentials:
- Collaboration
True collaboration isn’t just working side-by-side—it’s aligning on a shared goal and appreciating the value of different perspectives. For instance, in a project team, one member might spot a client risk others overlook due to their specific expertise. Strong collaboration means their voice is heard and considered.
- Coordination
Teams must be clear on roles, responsibilities, and timing. Who’s doing what—and when? Without proper coordination, even simple tasks can fall through the cracks, especially in industries with tightly sequenced workflows like healthcare, finance, or manufacturing.
- Communication
Poor communication is the most common cause of team breakdowns. It’s not just about talking more—it’s about ensuring that information is accurate, timely, and reaches the right people.
Why Every Team Needs a Leader—But Not Always the Same Kind
Leadership style can make or break a team. Broadly speaking, there are two main styles:
- Democratic leadership: values group input, ideal for building trust and motivation.
- Autocratic leadership: makes decisions quickly, useful in high-pressure or time-sensitive settings.
The best leaders adjust their approach based on the team’s needs and the task at hand. Interestingly, research shows that gaining power tends to shift people toward more independent thinking—often reducing their willingness to consult others. This is true for both men and women, though women leaders often maintain a stronger group orientation even as they rise.
What Goes Wrong in Group Decisions? Two Common Pitfalls
- Groupthink
This occurs when teams avoid conflict to maintain harmony. Members stop questioning decisions—even bad ones. It’s how warning signs get ignored and poor choices are rubber-stamped. Think of a team launching a flawed product because no one wants to speak up.
- Group Polarisation
Sometimes, groups make more extreme decisions than individuals would. A cautious team becomes overly conservative, or a confident team takes bigger risks than any one member would suggest alone. It’s a distortion of reality that comes from collective confidence—and it can backfire.
Size Matters: Why Smaller Teams Often Perform Better
The ideal team size? Around five people.
Once a team grows beyond that, accountability tends to blur. People assume someone else will take responsibility. This leads to social loafing, where effort drops because everyone believes others are picking up the slack.
In large organisations, this problem scales. When something goes wrong, individuals are quick to say, “That wasn’t my area.” The collective “we” dissolves, replaced by a flurry of self-preservation.
The Cultural Side of Teamwork
Teamwork isn’t just psychological—it’s cultural. In Western countries, the individual is often seen as the core unit. In Eastern cultures like Japan or South Korea, the group comes first.
This plays out in how accountability is assigned. In Europe or the US, a failed initiative may be traced to a single manager. In Japanese firms, the entire team may take collective responsibility.
Understanding these cultural differences is vital, especially for global teams.
How to Build a High-Performing Team
Strong teams don’t come together by chance—they’re built deliberately. Here’s how:
- Keep teams as small as possible for the task
- Define clear roles and responsibilities
- Select members for both technical ability and interpersonal skills
- Create psychological safety where people feel safe speaking up
- Encourage empathy and perspective-taking
In some industries, exercises that ask team members to “step into each other’s shoes” have shown real value. For example, asking a team leader to write from the perspective of a frontline employee can open up new insights into how decisions are experienced on the ground.
Diversity Isn’t Just a Buzzword—It’s a Necessity
Teams that are too similar in mindset, background, or personality often suffer from groupthink. In sectors like consulting or investment banking, hiring from the same profile pool can reduce the range of ideas and increase competition within teams.
The strongest teams are diverse in thought, experience, and working styles—and know how to leverage that difference rather than suppress it.
Final Thoughts: The Future of Work Is Team-Based
Whether you’re delivering financial services, leading a healthcare team, managing a creative agency, or running a non-profit, your results depend on how well your team works together.
The psychology of teamwork offers more than theory—it gives us a framework to build better collaboration, avoid common pitfalls, and unlock real performance.
What makes teamwork effective—and why it fails? Because in the end, success isn’t just about having great people.
It’s about building great teams.
The Right Conversation Can Change Everything. Let’s Talk.
See Harvards Business Review
by Atiya Sheikh | Mar 2, 2025 | Board Members, CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, Heads of Divisions, Managing Directors, News & Articles
Boeing was once a leader in aerospace innovation, symbolising excellence in engineering and manufacturing. Today, it faces a crisis driven by leadership decisions, corporate strategy, and technical failures. The company’s struggles serve as a warning to senior executives across industries—short-term decision-making and an excessive focus on financial metrics can weaken a company’s core strengths, with lasting consequences.
The Risks of Prioritising Shareholder Value Over Long-Term Stability
One of Boeing’s biggest mistakes was prioritising shareholder value over its core operations. The company spent an estimated $68 billion on share buybacks between 2010 and 2024. While these decisions pleased investors in the short term, they weakened Boeing’s ability to invest in research, quality control, and supplier relationships.
Instead of focusing on innovation and product excellence, Boeing’s leadership prioritised financial engineering. The consequences have been severe: supply chain failures, declining safety standards, reputational damage, and financial losses.
The lesson is clear: financial success should result from strong leadership, not be the sole focus of corporate strategy. Companies that chase short-term stock market gains at the expense of sustainable growth put their foundations at risk.
The Consequences of Outsourcing and Disengaged Leadership
Boeing’s reliance on outsourcing and offshoring aimed to streamline operations and reduce costs. In reality, it created a fragmented supply chain with serious quality control issues.
The 787 Dreamliner illustrates this problem. Boeing designed it with a highly outsourced production model, sourcing 30% of components from outside the US, compared to just 5% for the 747. Management assumed external suppliers would uphold Boeing’s engineering standards. Instead, a lack of direct oversight led to production delays, technical flaws, and costly redesigns.
Many industries have followed a similar path, prioritising cost-cutting over quality and control. The lesson for senior leaders? A company should never outsource its core competencies. While strategic partnerships and global supply chains have benefits, they must be carefully managed to maintain operational integrity.
Leadership and Its Impact on Organisational Culture
Boeing’s cultural shift stems from two major decisions:
- The 1997 Merger with McDonnell Douglas – This merger introduced a more aggressive, Wall Street-driven mindset. The company moved away from its legacy of engineering excellence and safety. Many analysts link this cultural shift to Boeing’s current struggles.
- The 2001 Relocation of Boeing’s Headquarters – Moving the headquarters from Seattle to Chicago distanced executives from frontline operations. This physical and cultural separation weakened leadership’s connection with engineers and production teams.
These decisions highlight an important lesson: leadership shapes corporate culture, and executives must remain engaged with core operations. The most successful organisations ensure that senior leaders stay closely connected to their people, processes, and products.
Lessons for Today’s Business Leaders
Boeing’s challenges are not unique to the aerospace sector. Industries such as technology, finance, healthcare, and manufacturing face similar pressures to cut costs, improve efficiency, and satisfy investors. However, as Boeing’s experience shows, prioritising efficiency over strategic investment can create long-term instability.
Key takeaways for executives and senior managers:
- Sustainable success requires long-term vision – Short-term financial gains should never compromise operational excellence and innovation.
- Outsourcing must be measured, not excessive – While external partnerships can improve efficiency, businesses must retain control over their most essential processes.
- Leadership must stay connected to the core business – Disengaged executives risk losing sight of the organisation’s purpose and values.
- Culture is a vital asset – A strong, mission-driven culture enhances resilience during crises.
A Path to Recovery?
Boeing’s new CEO, Kelly Ortberg, appears to recognise the need for change. His decision to base himself in Seattle rather than the company’s Arlington, Virginia, headquarters signals a return to hands-on leadership. His approach—prioritising safety, quality, and direct engagement—could help restore Boeing’s credibility.
For leaders across industries, Boeing’s story is a reminder that business success is not just about financial performance. It is about building a company that can stand the test of time.
How is your organisation balancing financial priorities with long-term sustainability?
The Right Conversation Can Change Everything. Let’s Talk.
by Atiya Sheikh | Mar 2, 2025 | Board Members, CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, News & Articles, Senior Managers, Women Leaders
Modern business thrives on rapid digital transformation, where data is more than just numbers—it is the foundation of innovation and operational success. Without trust in data, even the most advanced AI systems can mislead organisations, causing financial losses and damaging reputations. Recent research highlights this risk: a 2024 Gartner study estimated that poor data quality drains 20–35% of operating revenue, while a Forrester report found that businesses lose 22% of revenue due to data inaccuracies. As generative AI (Gen AI) reshapes industries, organisations must strengthen data trust to harness its full potential.
Data as a Strategic Asset
Reliable data enables leaders to make smarter decisions and drive innovation. However, inaccurate or inconsistent data can lead to costly mistakes, such as incorrect pricing, flawed stock forecasts, or misallocated revenue. These errors can result in substantial financial losses and reputational harm. A McKinsey survey found that 65% of organisations now use Gen AI to enhance decision-making, nearly doubling its adoption in just one year.
Businesses must establish sound data governance to mitigate risks. This requires more than deploying advanced technology; it involves nurturing a data-driven culture and investing in staff training. By standardising data management practices and implementing strong security measures, organisations can transform raw data into a strategic advantage.
Unlocking Efficiency and Innovation with AI
AI integration is already reshaping industries. In customer call centres, Gen AI has reduced transaction times by up to 80% while increasing customer satisfaction by 20%. In aerospace, defence, manufacturing, and automotive sectors, AI-powered 3D modelling accelerates product design and production. Meanwhile, digital twins revolutionise supply chain management.
A global Statista report found that 57% of organisations expect AI to drive efficiency and innovation. By leveraging AI and automation, companies optimise processes and unlock new opportunities. These range from personalised customer experiences to enhanced ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting, which supports sustainable growth.
Building and Maintaining Data Trust
To fully capitalise on AI, organisations must first assess their data quality. Identifying gaps and creating a clear improvement strategy are essential steps. A strong governance model should define roles, responsibilities, and processes that safeguard data integrity. Studies show that companies with robust data governance are 40% more likely to outperform competitors.
Upskilling employees is equally important. As AI-driven operations expand, collaboration between data teams and business units ensures data remains accurate, consistent, and secure.
Regulation, Ethics, and Responsible Data Use
Once data trust is established, maintaining it requires strict attention to regulation and ethics. AI technologies now detect anomalies, reduce manual errors, and predict trends, automating data quality checks. However, ethical considerations remain essential. Organisations must implement safeguards against biases in AI algorithms, ensuring transparency in data use and accountability in AI-driven decisions. Understanding a dataset’s origin—its lineage—reinforces transparency and responsible usage, ultimately strengthening trust.
Looking Ahead: A Data-Driven Future in 2025 and Beyond
As Gen AI continues expanding, its influence will grow stronger. The UK government’s AI Opportunities Action Plan, introduced in January, highlights data’s role in creating jobs, driving innovation, and increasing productivity. With global AI investments rising, the strategic value of data integrity becomes even clearer.
In 2025, businesses that enhance data trust will lead successful AI adoption and improve performance. Organisations that prioritise secure, accurate, and transparent data will protect their operations while unlocking new opportunities for growth and innovation.
There is no substitute for data you can trust. How is your organisation ensuring data integrity in an AI-driven world? By investing in strong governance, ethical AI practices, and continuous upskilling, businesses can turn data challenges into competitive advantages in an increasingly digital world.
The Right Conversation Can Change Everything. Let’s Talk.
by Atiya Sheikh | Feb 7, 2025 | Board Members, Board Trustees, CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, Heads of Divisions, Human Resources (HR), Leadership Development, Middle Managers, News & Articles, Non-Executive Board Members
Working across multiple countries, I have seen first-hand how organisations perceive themselves as digitally prepared. However, despite rapid advancements, many businesses and employees are still not ready for the demands of a truly digital-first world. The gap between perception and reality remains wide, with technology often outpacing workforce readiness.
The Hidden Digital Divide: Why Your Workforce Isn’t as Ready as You Think
Technology is no longer a competitive advantage—it is a necessity. However, a surprising disconnect exists. Many organisations believe they are digitally equipped, but research from Virgin Media O2 Business and the Centre for Economics & Business Research (Cebr) reveals that only a fraction truly harness technology to empower employees and improve productivity.
The Cost of Falling Behind
The consequences of digital stagnation are significant. Between 2021 and 2023, the UK economy missed out on an estimated £111 billion in turnover due to digital inefficiencies. But this issue is not limited to the UK. Across the globe, nations that lag in digital transformation risk economic decline, lower workforce productivity, and reduced global competitiveness.
A Global Challenge with High Stakes
Governments and businesses worldwide recognise the urgency of digital transformation. Some nations have launched large-scale initiatives to bridge the skills gap and improve their position in the digital economy:
- Nigeria’s 3 Million Technical Talent (3MTT) Programme aims to train three million digital specialists by 2027, preparing the country to become a key exporter of tech talent.
-
In Kenya, AI-driven agricultural tools such as PlantVillage and Virtual Agronomist have significantly increased farming productivity by providing precise recommendations on fertilisation, pest control, and soil health.
While these initiatives show how digital investment can drive growth, some nations still struggle with digital adoption despite high technological penetration. For instance, the GSMA Report on South Africa’s Digital Economy highlights that despite high mobile and internet access, the country still faces slow digital adoption in industries outside finance and telecommunications. Access to digital tools alone does not guarantee transformation. Businesses must integrate technology into their workflows and build a workforce capable of leveraging digital advancements.
What obstacles are holding them back, and what steps can they take to accelerate adoption?
Why Digital Transformation Stalls: Barriers to Adoption
Despite investment in digital tools, many companies fail to unlock their full potential due to key obstacles:
- Cultural Resistance – Employees who are used to traditional workflows often see digital transformation as a threat—whether in the form of increased workload, job displacement, or unfamiliarity with new tools.
- Legacy Systems & Outdated Infrastructure – Many organisations rely on outdated technology that stifles innovation. Without proper integration, new tools can create inefficiencies rather than solve them.
- Lack of Leadership Alignment – Digital transformation requires strong leadership commitment. If executives do not support digital adoption, employees are less likely to engage.
- The Digital Skills Gap – A recent Department for Education Employer Skills Survey (2024) found that nine in ten UK businesses struggle with skills shortages, particularly in entry-level positions (32% of the gap) and technical fields (29%). Alarmingly, the proportion of businesses considering training programmes has dropped from 60% in 2024 to 54% in 2025 due to financial constraints and lack of awareness.
The digital skills gap is estimated to cost the UK economy £63 billion annually. 18% of UK adults (7.5 million people) lack essential workplace digital skills, with 1.9 million unable to perform any basic digital tasks at work. These figures highlight the pressing need for sustained digital training initiatives.
Steps to Accelerate Digital Transformation
Organisations must take a people-first approach to digital transformation. Here’s how:
1. Lead with Clear Goals – Digital transformation is about people, not just technology. Employees are more likely to embrace change when they understand how digital tools align with organisational goals. Leaders must clearly communicate the purpose behind digital initiatives and ensure alignment across teams.
2. Invest in Digital Skills – One-off training sessions are ineffective. Organisations must embed ongoing digital learning into their culture. This includes:
- Prioritising digital literacy at all levels, from entry-level staff to executives.
- Offering on-demand training in emerging technologies such as AI, cloud computing, and cybersecurity.
- Partnering with educational institutions and online platforms to upskill employees cost-effectively.
3. Encourage Experimentation – A digital workforce needs space to innovate. Companies should:
- Encourage employees to test and experiment with new tools.
- Provide safe environments for digital experimentation and feedback.
- Recognise and reward employees who adopt digital-first approaches.
4. Improve Digital Communication & Collaboration – Remote and hybrid work requires strong digital collaboration. Ensuring that employees are comfortable using tools like Microsoft Teams, Slack, and AI-driven communication platforms can boost efficiency and teamwork.
Aligning Digital Tools with Business Goals
Technology is only effective when supported by a strong strategy. Businesses can maximise their digital investments by:
- Reviewing Digital Tools: Many organisations accumulate unnecessary digital tools. A tech audit can streamline processes and reduce costs.
- Encouraging Collaboration Across Departments: Digital adoption should not be limited to IT teams. Engaging all departments ensures widespread transformation.
- Tracking Progress: A data-driven approach helps businesses adapt their digital strategy. Employee feedback and performance metrics ensure long-term success.
A Future-Ready Workforce Starts with Leadership
Closing the digital divide requires leadership commitment. CEOs, CIOs, and senior executives must not only support digital transformation but actively engage in it. Organisations that build a digital-first culture will gain a competitive edge, increase efficiency, and drive growth.
The digital future is here—is your workforce ready?
The Right Conversation Can Change Everything. Let’s Talk.
Sources
